Doe Master wrote:Maybe instead of using the word synthetic , use glass filled synthetic polymer .
Kevin, they should move you into marketing.
Moderators: Bill T, Excalibur Marketing Dude
Doe Master wrote:Maybe instead of using the word synthetic , use glass filled synthetic polymer .

TPM wrote:It is not my intent to persuade anyone one way or another nor to tick anyone off and I apologize if that's the case. For the benefit of the newer forum members, we went through all this a year ago when the Axiom came out.
A lot of perspective buyers use this forum as a source of information when deciding which bow to buy and when I see comments accusing Excal of cheapening their bows for the sake of profit and speculating that these inovations constitute a downfall in Excal quality I feel the need to chime in as this is simply not true. There was a need to expand their product line to include a more affordable bow and I think they did an excellent job of addressing this need without comprimising the integrity of their product. I don't always like some of the decisions Excal makes in their product line either ( I would like to see more non camo stuff) but I understand that they have to look at the big picture and that my personal preferences aren't always what sells.
Sure, you'll find that most of the die-hard fans will likely go for the aluminum rail over the SMF but that doesn't make the SMF junk.


TPM wrote:It is not my intent to persuade anyone one way or another nor to tick anyone off and I apologize if that's the case. For the benefit of the newer forum members, we went through all this a year ago when the Axiom came out.
A lot of perspective buyers use this forum as a source of information when deciding which bow to buy and when I see comments accusing Excal of cheapening their bows for the sake of profit and speculating that these inovations constitute a downfall in Excal quality I feel the need to chime in as this is simply not true. There was a need to expand their product line to include a more affordable bow and I think they did an excellent job of addressing this need without comprimising the integrity of their product. I don't always like some of the decisions Excal makes in their product line either ( I would like to see more non camo stuff) but I understand that they have to look at the big picture and that my personal preferences aren't always what sells.
Sure, you'll find that most of the die-hard fans will likely go for the aluminum rail over the SMF but that doesn't make the SMF junk.


Big58cal wrote:I don't know if Excalibur considered it or not, but a large segment of the crossbow shooters are older men/women that can no longer use a "vertical" bow for whatever reason. Being of the older generation, they want METAL, not plastic (I know the SMF isn't "plastic" though).
I don't doubt that the SMF rails are just as strong as aluminum rails, and are probably more durable. But just as what my buddy said (he's 68 years old), after handling several different models of Excalibur bows, he said the SMF looked kinda' cheap.
I suspect that it's just in some older people's heads that any type of plastic, fiberglass, or poly resin will never be as good as something made of metal. Not saying that their opinion is wrong, but it is THEIR opinion.


SR CHIEF wrote:I'am hearing that the Phoenix is being replaced by the IBEX.

SR CHIEF wrote:I'am hearing that the Phoenix is being replaced by the IBEX.
taz3 wrote:the Ibex and Phoenix are not the same Xbow, the stock grip, Camo pattern and overall length are different.

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], georgiaboy, JHunter, Jim M, Masboy, swalsh, Valkyrie-Rider, xcaliber, yooper_man and 5 guests