Why not use a fixed blade broadhead?

Crossbow Hunting

Moderator: Excalibur Marketing Dude

Lucky-Dog
Posts: 298
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2011 8:34 pm
Location: Tennessee

Re: Why not use a fixed blade broadhead?

Post by Lucky-Dog »

Ive had extremely good luck in accuracy from the one solid piece design of the
Montec CS. I also agree with using nothing but a fixed broadhead and agree with all the reasons why that were mentioned as well.
Matrix Cub
Montec CS 100 grain
User avatar
NEPAbowhunter
Posts: 524
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2012 1:15 pm
Location: Steamtown, PA.

Re: Why not use a fixed blade broadhead?

Post by NEPAbowhunter »

I have used a lot of broadheads over the years both fixed and mechanical. I know there are a lot of haters but I find myself coming back to the Rage 2 blade. The hole and blood loss these heads cause are simply amazing.

Image
Matrix 355
Bulldog 380
Mission Sub-1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bS9N8dEdZCQ
bob1961
Posts: 1835
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2007 7:58 pm
Location: White Mills, PA

Re: Why not use a fixed blade broadhead?

Post by bob1961 »

i started archery hunting in 1980 using bear razorheads in 145gr until i switched to slick tricks in 2008, only two BH's i ever used :wink: ....
exocet 200. STS dampers.
boo string and trigger work.
munch mount quiver mount.
125 gr slick trick magums.
2" blazers on 2117 XX75 w/ brass inserts.
User avatar
Ont_Excal
Posts: 2094
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2011 12:30 pm
Location: Beautiful nth shr of Lk Erie

Re: Why not use a fixed blade broadhead?

Post by Ont_Excal »

bob1961 wrote:i started archery hunting in 1980 using bear razorheads in 145gr until i switched to slick tricks in 2008, only two BH's i ever used :wink: ....
I got serious with the archery about the same time. Harvested my first deer in 83. Still have 3 Bear razorheads in unused condition and never did install the bleeder blades. I did try a few different heads but quickly settled on NAP Thunderheads and still use today.
"Death leaves a heartache no one can heal. Love leaves a memory no one can steal"
Lake shooter
Posts: 545
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2013 6:36 pm
Location: Little Rock AR

Re: Why not use a fixed blade broadhead?

Post by Lake shooter »

NEPAbowhunter wrote:I have used a lot of broadheads over the years both fixed and mechanical. I know there are a lot of haters but I find myself coming back to the Rage 2 blade. The hole and blood loss these heads cause are simply amazing.

Image
Glad they have worked foryou so far. Hope you never experience a blade or two deploying on the shot as I have. That was enough for me, and yes, they were seated 100%.

Good luck in the future. :wink:
bob1961
Posts: 1835
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2007 7:58 pm
Location: White Mills, PA

Re: Why not use a fixed blade broadhead?

Post by bob1961 »

I won't leave slick tricks any time soon with how they do the job :wink: ....
exocet 200. STS dampers.
boo string and trigger work.
munch mount quiver mount.
125 gr slick trick magums.
2" blazers on 2117 XX75 w/ brass inserts.
User avatar
XcaliburFX
Posts: 478
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2013 8:48 pm
Location: Carrollton, Georgia

Re: Why not use a fixed blade broadhead?

Post by XcaliburFX »

Fixed for me ... "NAP Thunderhead Razor" 100gr :)
Assassin 360 Strata
BEA Zombie Slayer - BEA Executioner
Boo/VixenMaster/Xcaliber/NCHunterKW Strings
Fred T
Posts: 562
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2013 10:15 pm
Location: Ontario WMU73

Re: Why not use a fixed blade broadhead?

Post by Fred T »

XcaliburFX wrote:Fixed for me ... "NAP Thunderhead Razor" 100gr :)
I have been reading lots of good reviews on these here and elsewhere ,so I think I'm going to snag a 3 pak.
Ibex SMF-S5-TactZone-BE Zombies/blazers
Wasp Jak Knife,Drone.
Vixenmaster string.
Mo wannabe
Posts: 1387
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 10:58 pm
Location: Bloomfield Missouri

Re: Why not use a fixed blade broadhead?

Post by Mo wannabe »

Montec g5 125 gr . My search is over
Micro 335 Camo. Micro Nightmare. Vixen Matrix 310 Axiom
Leupold scopes VixenMaster Strings
Big john arrows. BOO strings & things
Montec g5
DaGriz knive
Less work.....more hunt
Derry Hicks
Excalibur only
vixenmaster
Posts: 13618
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2005 3:51 pm
Location: Western Ky

Re: Why not use a fixed blade broadhead?

Post by vixenmaster »

FWIW the smaller profile BH's don't use as much energy in penetration as the larger ones do. Other designs do, as in the Toxic wid its clover leaf style. I shot the 7 pt usin 347gr arrow at 303 fps 3' in front of chrony & it had a 2" BH pass-through exit. Spect if'en it were another 30gr or so heavier it would have been on the ground on site of shot. Or used a faster model Excal
Half Bubble Off BD360

[email protected] 417-505-9315
lvt01
Posts: 376
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 7:43 pm
Location: SE Minnesota

Re: Why not use a fixed blade broadhead?

Post by lvt01 »

I'm glad you fellas can get those NAP Thunderheads to work for you. I tried them a few years ago when I started with cb's and had trouble with them always planing. Never could get them to group worth a darn past 20 yards. After using the Boltcutters I went to the NAP Spitfire XP pro's when they came out and still use them even though they've been discontintued. Was able to pick up 18 new bh's from a guy a while back, so still have 15 that are new. Should hold me for a couple years. I got a decent deal on some 2 blade RAGE Xbow 125g with the new cup retainer design earlier this year. Was going to give those a try out of my Matrix, but haven't had anything walk in front of me big enough to shoot at yet.
Tom
Posts: 2640
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 8:43 pm
Location: Ontario Canada
Contact:

Re: Why not use a fixed blade broadhead?

Post by Tom »

Why not use a fixed blade broadhead .........

The answer is, I want accuracy with the larger cutting diameter heads. Yes you can get larger cutting heads to be very accurate, but when you get into windy conditions, especially when it is a cross wind the larger heads seem to wonder or plain as other have said. I also do not have a problem with the extra maintenance needed for mechanicals to make sure that they are in hunting condition.

It does not matter what hunting head you use, there will be times that factors determine that a miss will happen, and most people then blame the style head they use, not the shooter :lol: :lol: .

I use the mechanical head because I want to eliminate most if not all variables which might cause a miss. If I miss, the first thing I look at is me, not the bow or arrow or hunting head. This is why I shoot Excalibur with Spitfires.

Tom
Tom
[img]http://hometown.aol.com/wingbonecall/images/turkey.gif[/img]
User avatar
Zap
Posts: 98
Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2013 1:38 am
Location: Kansas, USA!

Re: Why not use a fixed blade broadhead?

Post by Zap »

125gn strikers!

8)
Duck or Bleed.....
User avatar
Ont_Excal
Posts: 2094
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2011 12:30 pm
Location: Beautiful nth shr of Lk Erie

Re: Why not use a fixed blade broadhead?

Post by Ont_Excal »

Until I built a proper arrow, fixed blades gave me problems with my vertical bows as well.
My crossbow now and vertical bows before are shot with 500 grain arrows.
FOC has been critical for dependable flight.
Blazers were a big improvement over regular vanes on arrows bought off the shelf.

Now mechanicals have their place even for me. I use a big mechanical on a minimum weight arrow for turkey hunting exclusively.

I'm not trying to convince anyone to convert to either or.
It's clear to me that both types shoot well when used properly.
"Death leaves a heartache no one can heal. Love leaves a memory no one can steal"
User avatar
Kegbelly
Posts: 1639
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2013 8:04 pm

Re: Why not use a fixed blade broadhead?

Post by Kegbelly »

Did I mention I like Magnus Stingers? :D Image
Matrix 380
18" Zombies, 400 gr w/ 125 gr Magnus Stingers & Lumenoks
Exomag
20" Zombies, 380 gr w/ 100 gr Magnus Stingers
Post Reply