ehntr wrote:He is wrong. You cannot redefine the definition of "draw length". He is most assuredly confusing "draw length" for "power stroke". An industry is built on the terms, definitions and other lexicon generally used in archery. AMO describes definitions not the Ontario MNR. A charge would not survive. I strongly suggest that you provide "MNR Chris" with the legal definition of draw length.
1) I am fairly confident that the ATA (formerly the AMO), a trade association, simply does not define law in Ontario (or likely anywhere). No more so than the automotive industry gets to set laws regarding emissions, speed limits, and safety requirements (they can lobby, advise, etc. but not set laws).
2) I would far rather stay within specifications than fight it out in court.
3) My searches for crossbow draw length yielded various definitions from: a) Crossbows don't have a draw length, b) it's the same as power stroke, c) it's measured from forward end of ramp to string when cocked, d) The various regulatory bodies have different definitions - check with yours.
4) My (admittedly cursory) search of the ATA website did not find a definition for crossbow draw length.
5) People are free to proceed with their choice of hunting tools as they see fit. I'm simply telling you what two different representatives of the Ontario MNR (The regulatory body for Ontario - NOT a trade association) have told me. I'm going to adhere to the regulations and the clarification the MNR has provided me. Others are free to proceed however they see fit.
-P