delete

Crossbow Hunting
Asking Bowman5
Posts: 32
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2015 4:31 pm

delete

Post by Asking Bowman5 »

H
Last edited by Asking Bowman5 on Sat Sep 12, 2015 12:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
xcaliber
Posts: 12850
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2013 7:35 pm
Location: NW Indiana

Re: Compound V.S recurve bows.

Post by xcaliber »

I have been shooting vertical compound bows for years, do my own cable, and string changes, etc. I had no idea that I would end up with a recurve crossbow when i first began looking into them. What sold me was the warranty is unmatched with Excalibur when you read this forum, and a few others. But the selling points for me were as follows:
You can change a string in seconds.
The owner at the time of my first purchase was an accomplished hunter with trophies from all over the world that he took with his bows.
The loyalty of the customers to the brand that I cannot compare to any other brand base out there.
After getting my first one, I realized I made the right choice, and the 4th one i bought is just as accurate, and reliable as all of them that i have owned.

My two cents!
It’s not the way you rock, it’s the way that you roll!
vixenmaster
Posts: 13618
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2005 3:51 pm
Location: Western Ky

Re: Compound V.S recurve bows.

Post by vixenmaster »

I don't knowed which is the better crossbow. I own couple of Excals n a Mission MXB320 Compound. Its more of a choice, which one do you enjoy or like well enuff to own it. Recurves generally are the easiest to work on n faster to take apart n put together again.
Half Bubble Off BD360

vixenmasterstrings@yahoo.com 417-505-9315
User avatar
Pa.hunter
Posts: 218
Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2014 8:51 pm
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Compound V.S recurve bows.

Post by Pa.hunter »

If you do a search on customer service I think you will see one of biggest reasons we all love our Excals. Finding a company that backs there product the way they do is almost unheard of these days. The other big thing for me is simplicity. I have bow hunted for 34 years and have learned to keep things as simple as possible. Less to go wrong in the heat of the moment.= Excal. :wink:

Charlie
Matrix 405 with Leupold VX-R FireDot duplex
Matrix 380 Xtra with Leupold VX-R FireDot duplex
Matrix 330 with Leupold Crossbones
TriggerTech Matrix hunter 2.5 in all 3
Black Eagles
bubba
Posts: 1855
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2014 4:39 pm
Location: West Central Fl

Re: Compound V.S recurve bows.

Post by bubba »

All three posts before me pretty much says it all..Warranty, Customer service, and this forum. All unmatched = Excalibur.....
Matrix, 355. Hawke Xb-30 Pro. Ibex, Nikon Bolt. Strings By Boo, Nchunter, Zombies & Spynal Tapps From South Shore Archery,Now Built By My Son, N.A.P. Spitfire XXX and Magnus Black Hornets. (Fight Hard..Love Fast.. Die Young..)
SEW
Posts: 1746
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2014 9:55 am
Location: NE Arkansas

Re: Compound V.S recurve bows.

Post by SEW »

As you know, I own a Sol 350, M380&405. Each has its strengths. I've owned xbows since 1983. My favorite xbows are the last 2 I mentioned . I can do everything at home. Even send in anything broken and receive stuff back. My recurves are the quietest xbows I've owned: didn't start that way but we're modded until they became such. The Excal following and support seems to be unmatched. You can customize until your billfold is empty. My 380 is whisper quiet, yet maintains <2" 100 yd 3-shot groups. The 405 doesn't quite have all the mods, is a little, not much, noisier(still quieter than the Sol 350 w/o the hand guard), and is as accurate shooting as the 380. I shoot coyotes at 100 yds w/o problem. And other things.
Personally, I'd get a Matrix and mod it as you desire and enjoy it indefinitely. It won't go out of style; rather, it'll become a classic. If serious hunting is your goal, the 405 is my pick of the litter unless you will hunt shorter ranges. Flat trajectory is your friend.
If you have a xbow press and want to do your own servicing and can get parts, etc, then a compound could make sense. If I ever get a compound, it'll likely be a Scorpyd. My Sol is a replacement for a 7 year old Strykeforce that is unrepareable. It is on permanent loan to a friend of mine.
Last edited by SEW on Fri Apr 03, 2015 7:51 am, edited 1 time in total.
paulaboutform
Posts: 4970
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2013 11:32 pm
Location: Coquitlam, British Columbia

Re: Compound V.S recurve bows.

Post by paulaboutform »

I've shot compound bows (vertical) for almost thirty years and have a full style pro shop at home. I can do all my own tuning (and that of friends) at any time. Not many people have that option or ability. I'm also a certified level 2 (technical and theory) archery coach. I'm telling you this because I have a sound knowledge base of compounds and can assure you that compound crossbows do go out of tune and can do so frequently. I'm sure you don't want to spend your time making trips to a pro shop to keep readjusting your cam sync and timing. I love my compound bows but when it comes to crossbows it's my Excals all the way. I get crazy power and ridiculously scary accuracy. I can and do adjust my brace height in seconds to maintain optimal performance and the bows are brilliantly simple. Just my 2 cents.

Paul
You're only paranoid if everyone isn't out to get you.
Keep your friends close and your enemies closer.
My enemy's friend is also my enemy.
strum
Posts: 3889
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 5:35 pm
Location: Blairsville Ga.

Re: Compound V.S recurve bows.

Post by strum »

compound ?..whats that? :lol: :lol: :lol:
Micro RTX
Nikon Bolt XR
BEE Arrows
Slick Trick Magnum
Unshot Beta Chrony
John3:16
vixenmaster
Posts: 13618
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2005 3:51 pm
Location: Western Ky

Re: Compound V.S recurve bows.

Post by vixenmaster »

strum wrote:compound ?..whats that? :lol: :lol: :lol:
a mixeture of at least 2 or more ingredients
Half Bubble Off BD360

vixenmasterstrings@yahoo.com 417-505-9315
Mo wannabe
Posts: 1387
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 10:58 pm
Location: Bloomfield Missouri

Re: Compound V.S recurve bows.

Post by Mo wannabe »

Excalibur Only..... Life is to short in hunting season to work on stuff !
Micro 335 Camo. Micro Nightmare. Vixen Matrix 310 Axiom
Leupold scopes VixenMaster Strings
Big john arrows. BOO strings & things
Montec g5
DaGriz knive
Less work.....more hunt
Derry Hicks
Excalibur only
Asking Bowman5
Posts: 32
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2015 4:31 pm

Re: Compound V.S recurve bows.

Post by Asking Bowman5 »

Mo wannabe wrote:Excalibur Only..... Life is to short in hunting season to work on stuff !
:lol: ya I guess your right about that. Excalibur for me. :)
Asking Bowman5
Posts: 32
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2015 4:31 pm

Re: Compound V.S recurve bows.

Post by Asking Bowman5 »

Mo wannabe wrote:Excalibur Only..... Life is to short in hunting season to work on stuff !
:lol: ya I guess your right about that. Excalibur for me. :)
User avatar
galamb
Posts: 554
Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2011 8:09 pm
Location: Inverary, Ontario

Re: Compound V.S recurve bows.

Post by galamb »

Compound bows are absolutely more compact. Even the Micro is "wide" compared to some of the compounds on the market.

There is probably three broad classes of crossbow shooters -

1) dedicated target shooters that shoot thousands of shots a year

2) hunter/plinkers - they may not compete but shoot a lot at either targets or animals - their crossbow may be their only "hunting weapon" and it's used for all manner of game - these users may shoot in the "hundreds" of shots a year

3) hail Mary hunters - those who "gun hunt" but try and squeeze out the "deer they missed" during the gun season using a crossbow that sits in the basement/garage until the "need it". It sees maybe a shot or two to make sure it's working and only comes out if the gun hunt was "unsuccessful".

If you fall into the third category then the answer is "whatever is cheapest". Even the worst built bow, be it a Chinese recurve or Barnett bargain basement compound, will last "a lifetime", and most probably without even so much as a string change.

If you fall into either the first or second group, the more you shoot, the more your gear will wear. And the more "mechanical things" involved, the quicker they will wear out.

Add in the uber-heavy draw weight bows that coming out as shooters reach for the speed of sound and that just compounds (pun) the wear and tear on the parts.

Compound = more parts = more things to go wrong = higher odds of a failure

Recurve = less parts = less things to go wrong = lower odds of failure

It's not opinion, it's simple math - if quality is equal then the bow with the greater number of moving parts will fail "sooner".

That doesn't mean that a compound will fail you. Some are extremely well built and could well last your lifetime with little more than string/cable changes.

So (my opinion), if you buy a high-end crossbow, whether it has "training wheels" or not, it comes down to a matter of "personal choice" and I don't see one outperforming the other one way or the other.
Graham

Micro 340TD, 17" Gold Tip Ballistics (180 gr inserts) - 125 gr Iron Will/VPA/TOTA (504 grains total/21.6% FOC) @ 301 FPS
xcaliber
Posts: 12850
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2013 7:35 pm
Location: NW Indiana

Re: Compound V.S recurve bows.

Post by xcaliber »

I don't think you can put it any better than that! :wink:
It’s not the way you rock, it’s the way that you roll!
User avatar
BrotherRon
Posts: 2178
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2014 2:47 am
Location: North Central Wisconsin
Contact:

Re: Compound V.S recurve bows.

Post by BrotherRon »

Pa.hunter wrote:If you do a search on customer service I think you will see one of biggest reasons we all love our Excals. Finding a company that backs there product the way they do is almost unheard of these days. The other big thing for me is simplicity. I have bow hunted for 34 years and have learned to keep things as simple as possible. Less to go wrong in the heat of the moment.= Excal. :wink:

Charlie
X 2
Matrix 310 ~ Hawke XB30 Pro SR ~ TT~Plano 36" All Weather Tactical Hard Case.
Danny Miller Top Mount Quiver.
Strings by Boo ~ nchunterkw ~ 8ptbuk
Jeremiah 29:13 :thumbup:
Post Reply